NLP vs. IPTAA

IPTAA and NLP have two things in common: on the one hand, both focus on directly increasing the self-efficacy of the practitioner and on the other, both create a systematic basis for a workable collection of "tools" for direct application. However, the rest is fundamentally different.

Despite this:

In the past, NLP was the method of choice for increasing communicative competency. The method of choice in the present and future for increasing holistic self-efficacy is IPTAA!

The most important characteristics at a glance:

	NLP Neurolinguistic programming	IPTAA integral purposeful thinking and acting
Development	1970s	2010s
Approach	Pseudo-scientific collection of methods	Science-based learning and management system
Original focus	Strengthening communication for psychologists and psychotherapists	Increasing the effectiveness and efficiency of specialist experts in projects
Drivers of development	Psychologists	Engineers and managers in cross-faculty collaborations
Fields of competence	Communicative influence	Understanding human behavior Communicating confidently and successfully Motivational leadership Structured and systematic goal achievement Overcoming special challenges
Tools	Methods Techniques	Systems Models Methods Techniques
Scope	Tools	Principals Tools Didactics and methodology Quality criteria
Improvement	Completed	Undergoes continuous improvement

IPTAA Gütesiegel <

> ProCompetence INSTITUTE

NLP vs. IPTAA

In the past, NLP was the method of choice for increasing communicative competency. The method of choice in the present and future for increasing holistic self-efficacy is IPTAA!

quality seal

Contact

SPREAD THE WORD

WE SERVE